![]() ICM Basics
What Is Management? What Is Integrated Coastal Management? What Triggers the Need for ICM? What Are Its Guiding Principles? What Are the Functions of ICM? What Capacity Is Needed for ICM? What Kinds of Institutions Carry Out ICM?
![]() |
|
Management of coastal areas involves multiple problems, multiple desired (and often conflicting) outputs from and uses of coastal resources, differential productive capacities over space and time within any designated coastal area, greater or lesser linkages to upstream areas and beyond, multiple constituencies, and multiple institutions with varying responsibilities for aspects of management. (section drawn from Bowler, Ehler, and Basta, 1994) The coastal system to be managed is comprised of a complex, dynamic web of interrelationships among human activities, societal demands, natural resources, and external natural and human inputs. The system is driven by human activities in terms of societal demands for use of the natural resources of the coastal area to produce desired products and services, e.g., seafood, marine transportation, and recreation. One of the demands of society might be to restore and/or maintain a coastal ecosystem in its "natural" state, i.e., as a protected area. Societal demands for outputs from a coastal area usually exceed the capacity of the area to meet all of the demands simultaneously. Coastal resources, e.g., fish and coral reefs, are often "common property resources" with "open" or "free" access to users. Free access often, if not typically, leads to excessive use of the resource, e.g., over-harvesting of fisheries, and degradation or exhaustion of the resource, e.g., coastal pollution and habitat degradation. Because not all of the outputs from coastal resources can be expressed in monetary terms, free markets cannot perform the allocation tasks. Some process must be used to decide what mix of outputs will be produced. That process is integrated coastal management (ICM). Management is a continuous, interactive, adaptive, participatory process comprised of a set of related tasks, all of which must be carried out to achieve a desired set of goals and objectives, however those goals and objectives are established and specified. Management of coastal areas must deal with at least the following factors:
Management of coastal areas takes place in various contexts, where context is defined in terms of multiple dimensions or characteristics. Table 1 indicates some of the factors that are relevant for defining the management context. For example, the economy may be predominantly a market economy, predominantly a non-market economy, or basically a mixed economy. Geographic scale can range from small islands to coastal areas of large continents; level of development from economies dependent on primary activities to so-called "post-industrial" or service economies. The form of government may be highly centralized or highly decentralized, i.e., dominated by the central government or by state/ provincial governments. Planning is an integral part of management. Operationally, it is the process of deciding who gets what, when, and where, how, at what cost, and who receives the benefits. Both the initiation of planning and the ultimate decisions taken as a result of planning are normally a function of a political process. The purpose of planning is to produce a framework (or plan) to guide decision makers in the immediate and future allocation of scarce resources (e.g., space, land, capital investments, fish, water) among competing interests (stakeholders). In the history of ICM, there have been at least three major motivations for the preparation of plans: to escape the tyranny of small decisions (also known as cumulative impact), to reduce the political and administrative costs of permit letting, and to provide a forum and vehicle for community based management (Sorensen, 1997). The concept of planning is important in what practitioners do. In order to adequately manage coastal systems, particularly the control of cumulative impacts, coastal management institutions must have a land use and water use plan to guide their policy making and decision-making processes (Sorensen, 1997). Planning for ICM must recognize that the coastal area typically is affected by activities: (a) upstream from the coastal area but within the drainage area of the coastal area; (b) external to the coastal area and its drainage area; and (c) down-stream from the coastal area, e.g., in the open ocean. Pressures on the resources of the coastal area may be greater from activities outside the coastal area than from activities internal to it. Following from the previous principle, planning for lCM must determine the relative importance of different sources contributing to specific problems in the ICM area. Relative importance is likely to differ with respect to the type of problem, time of year, and from year to year depending on hydrologic and economic conditions. Planning for ICM should consider explicitly plans and actions of other sectors of the economy, in terms of the time pattern of proposed, and in progress, capital investments and operation, maintenance, and replacement (OMR) expenditures. Activities in other sectors may have major implications for the ICM sector, and the reverse. From the preceding follows the principle that there should be a common framework across sectors for making economic and demographic projections, developing scenarios, and using similar analytical techniques for analyzing benefits and costs. Achieving such a common framework is difficult, since there rarely is an institution with overall responsibility for integrated planning and development of sectoral action programs. Table 1. Some Factors Relevant for Defining the Context of ICM Category
Description of Effect on Context
1. Management
Goals
In relation to: (1)
level of sophistication i.e., degree of detail of
output; (2) scope of planning, i.e., time horizon,
number of variables considered; (3) constraints
imposed on planning, i.e., number of inter-regional
economic effects considered
2. Government
and/or Institutional Structure
In relation to:(1)
institutions responsible for ICM analysis
and
management over
time; (2) institutional capacity, i.e., numbers,
types, and experience of professionals in relevant
institutions; (3) Implementation "style," i.e..,
emphasis on use of different implementation tools;
(4) importance of public participation in decision
process; (5) sources of financing for
implementation management strategies
3. Resources Available for
Analysis
With respect to:
(1) professional personnel available: (2)
time
available; (3)
analysis tools, e.g., models: (4) equipment, e.g.,
computing services and monitoring tools
4. Data Availability
In relation to(1)
natural systems, e.g., surface waters, ground
water, atmosphere, ecological processes; (2)
pollutant generation and discharge, i.e., pollutant
generation coefficients, spatial and temporal
pattern of activities, technological
characteristics of activities; (3) pollutant
discharge reduction costs
5. Existing
Perceptions in Coastal
Area
As perceived by
individuals and groups in the area in
relation
to: (1)
difference between what is perceived as a severe
coastal management problem and reality; (2) what
appears to be logical, reasonable, efficient, and
effective ICM strategies compared to what is; (3)
differences between actual and desired
conditions
6. Regional
Boundaries
With respect to:
(1) natural or ecological systems boundaries; (2)
political jurisdictions; (3) economic boundaries;
(4) service units, e.g., water districts; and
(5)scale
7.
Physiographic, Hydrographic,
and Climatic Characteristics
With respect to:
(1) physiographic, i.e., mountains, plains, and
combinations; (2) hydrographic, i.e., surface
waters and
groundwater;
(3) climatic, i.e., temperature, sunlight, and
precipitation
8. Characteristics
of Animals and Habitats
With respect to
abundance, life histories, and biographies
Source: Bower, Ehler, and Basta (1994).
|
|
|