
ICM Basics
Introduction
What Is the
Coast?
What Is
Management?
What Does
Integrated Mean?
What Is Integrated
Coastal Management?
What Triggers the
Need for ICM?
What Are Its
Guiding Principles?
What Are the Functions of
ICM?
What Capacity Is
Needed for ICM?
What Kinds of
Institutions Carry Out ICM?
References
"ICM initiatives are
designed to develop public awareness, build capacity, foster
cooperation, strengthen institutional and legal frameworks,
and formulate and implement issue-driven action
plans."
"What differentiates ICM
from other forms of development planning is that it
facilitates the optimization of the economic and social
benefits derived from the use of natural resources."
"Since all forms of
development impact on the health and productivity of coastal
ecosystems, sustainable economic and social development of
coastal areas cannot be separated from sound environmental
planning and management."
|
|
From the start, ICM initiatives are
designed to develop public awareness, build capacity, foster
cooperation, strengthen institutional and legal frameworks,
and formulate and implement issue-driven action plans. With
the development of enhanced experience and skills, the scope
of the ICM program expands to address new problems, explore
new development opportunities, and further strengthen
management skills, interagency cooperation, collaboration,
and integration of development and environmental protection.
Beyond the limits of national boundaries, ICM could serve as
an instrument to resolve international transboundary issues,
such as marine pollution, overexploitation of shared stocks
of resources, and the conservation of biological diversity.
(Chua, 1996: 2)
ICM improves the traditional forms of
development planning in four distinct ways, namely:
- Furtherance of a thorough
understanding of the natural resources systems which are
unique to the coastal areas and their sustainability
within the context of a wide variety of human
activities,
- Optimization of the multiple use
of the coastal resource systems through the integration
of ecological, social, and economic information,
- Promotion of interdisciplinary
approaches and intersectoral cooperation and coordination
to address complex development issues and formulate
integrated strategies for the expansion and
diversification of economic activities, and
- Assistance to governments to
improve the efficiency and effectiveness of capital
investment and natural and human resources in achieving
economic, social, and
environmental objectives as well as in meeting
international obligations
concerning the coastal and marine environment. (Chua,
1996: 3)
What differentiates ICM from other
forms of development planning is that it facilitates the
optimization of the economic and social benefits derived
from the use of natural resources. Where sustainable
development depends upon renewable resources generated by
the coastal systems, such as estuaries, ICM facilitates the
multiple use management which maintains the functional
integrity of the systems and a constant flow of resources.
Since all forms of development impact on the health and
productivity of coastal ecosystems, sustainable economic and
social development of coastal areas cannot be separated from
sound environmental planning and management. This is as
important to developing economies heavily dependent on the
quality of the environment and natural resources to sustain
food security as it is to developed economies with intensive
forms of coastal development. (Chua, 1996: 2)
In contrast to sectoral entities and
processes, which tend to be concerned with only one use or
resource of the coastal and marine environment, the ICM
process is expected to address several important functions
related to overall patterns of use, the well-being of marine
and coastal areas, and the protection of key fisheries
habitat, as set out in Table 2. The typical
activities related to these functions are detailed in
Table 3. Table 4 summarizes types of
activities that in 1996 were reported to be part of 29
national ICM efforts (Cicin-Sain and Knecht, 1998).
Table 2. Major Functions of
Integrated Coastal Management
Area Planning
Plan for present and future uses of coastal and marine
areas; provide a long term vision.
Promotion of Economic
Development
Promote appropriate uses of coastal and marine areas
(e.g., marine aquaculture, ecotourism).
Stewardship of Resources
Protect the ecological base of coastal and marine areas;
preserve biological diversity; ensure sustainability of
uses.
Conflict Resolution
Harmonize and balance existing and potential uses;
address conflicts among coastal and marine uses.
Protection of Public Safety
Protect public safety in coastal and marine areas
typically prone to significant natural, as well as
human-made, hazards.
Proprietorship of Public Submerged
Lands and Waters
As governments are often outright owners of specific
coastal and marine areas, manage government-held areas and
resources wisely and with good economic returns to the
public.
Table 3. Typical ICM
Activities
|
Area Planning
|
Stewardship of Resources
|
|
Studies of coastal environments and their uses
|
Conduct of environmental assessments
|
|
Zoning of uses
|
Conduct of relative risk assessments
|
|
Aniticipation of and planning for new uses
|
Establishment and enforcement of environmental
standards
|
|
Regulation of coastal development projects and
their proximity to the shoreline
|
Protection and improvement of coastal water
quality (point sources, nonpoint sources)
|
|
Public education on the value of coastal and
marine areas
|
Establishment and management of coastal and
marine protected areas
|
|
Regulation of public access to coastal and
marine areas
|
Conservation and restoration of coastal and
marine environments (mangrove forests, coral reefs,
wetlands, etc.)
|
|
|
|
|
Promotion of Economic Development
|
Conflict Resolution
|
|
Industrial Fisheries
|
Studies of multiple uses and their interactions
|
|
Artisinal Fisheries
|
Applications of conflict resolution methods
|
|
Mass tourism
|
Mitigation of unavoidable adverse effects on
some uses
|
|
Ecotourism
|
|
|
Marine aquaculture
|
|
|
Marine transportation
|
|
|
Port development
|
|
|
Marine recreation
|
|
|
Offshore minerals
|
|
|
Ocean research
|
|
|
Access to genetic resources
|
|
Table 4. Types of ICM Activities
Conducted in Selected Countries
|
|
All (%)
|
Developed
(%)
|
Middle Developing
(%)
|
Developing
|
|
|
(N = 49)
|
(N = 14)
|
(N = 15)
|
(N = 20)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Area
Planning
|
|
|
|
|
|
Studies of coastal
environments and their uses
|
92
|
79
|
93
|
100
|
|
Zoning of uses
|
76
|
79
|
73
|
75
|
|
Anticipation of and
planning for new uses
|
57
|
71
|
53
|
50
|
|
Regulation of
coastal development projects and their proximity to
the shoreline
|
73
|
79
|
73
|
70
|
|
Public education on
the value of coastal and marine areas
|
69
|
64
|
73
|
70
|
|
Regulation of
public access to coastal and marine areas
|
65
|
71
|
73
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promotion of
Economic Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial
fisheries
|
55
|
57
|
67
|
45
|
|
Artisanal fisheries
|
63
|
43
|
80
|
65
|
|
Mass tourism
|
53
|
50
|
67
|
45
|
|
Ecotourism
|
69
|
57
|
67
|
80
|
|
Marine aquaculture
|
88
|
86
|
93
|
85
|
|
Marine
transportation
|
51
|
50
|
53
|
50
|
|
Port development
|
73
|
79
|
67
|
75
|
|
Marine recreation
|
80
|
93
|
87
|
65
|
|
Offshore minerals
|
45
|
43
|
40
|
50
|
|
Ocean research
|
61
|
50
|
67
|
65
|
|
Access to genetic
resources
|
22
|
21
|
20
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stewardship of
Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conduct of
environmental assessments
|
90
|
86
|
80
|
100
|
|
Conduct of relative
risk assessments
|
45
|
71
|
40
|
30
|
|
Establishment and
enforcement of environmental standards
|
73
|
79
|
67
|
75
|
|
Protection and
improvement of water quality (point sources,
nonpoint sources)
|
76
|
93
|
73
|
65
|
|
Establishment and
management of coastal and marine protected
areas
|
80
|
86
|
87
|
70
|
|
Conservation and
restoration of coastal and marine environments
(mangroves, coral reefs, wetlands)
|
78
|
71
|
73
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflict
Resolution
|
|
|
|
|
|
Studies of multiple
uses and their interactions
|
71
|
71
|
67
|
75
|
|
Applications of
conflict resolution methods
|
47
|
50
|
53
|
40
|
|
Mitigation of
unavoidable adverse effects on some uses
|
47
|
64
|
40
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Protection of
Public Safety
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction of
vulnerability to natural disasters and global
changes (e.g., sea-level rise)
|
41
|
64
|
34
|
30
|
|
Regulation of
development in high-risk areas through such methods
as the establishment of "set-back lines"
|
49
|
50
|
53
|
45
|
|
Construction of
coastal defense measures (e.g., seawalls)
|
61
|
64
|
60
|
60
|
|
Creation of
evacuation plans or other measures in case of
coastal emergency
|
31
|
50
|
27
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proprietorship
of Public Submerged Lands and Waters
|
|
|
|
|
|
Establishment of
leases and fees for use of publicly held coastal
and marine resources and spaces
|
49
|
64
|
47
|
40
|
|
Establishment of
joint ventures to exploit nonrenewable resources
(e.g., offshore oil)
|
35
|
29
|
33
|
40
|
Note: Percentages
do not add up to 100% because respondents were allowed to
mark multiple activities.
Source: Cicin-Sain
and Knecht, 1998, pp. 47-49.
The 1996 cross-national survey
conducted by Cicin-Sain and Knecht points to the following
major findings:
*The most significant ICM
activity reported was area planning, with 92 percent of
responses reporting conduct of studies of the coastal
zone, 76 percent reporting zoning of uses, and 73 percent
reporting regulation of coastal development projects and
their proximity to the shoreline.
*Respondents also frequently
reported activities to promote economic development,
especially for marine aquaculture (88 percent of
responses), marine recreation (80 percent of responses,
with the greatest proportion from developed countries),
port development (73 percent of responses), and
ecotourism. (69 percent of responses, with the greatest
proportion from developing countries).
*With respect to stewardship of
resources, 90 percent of respondents reported the conduct
of environmental assessments and 80 percent reported the
establishment and management of coastal and marine
protected areas.
*Regarding conflict resolution, 71
percent of respondents reported the conduct of studies of
multiple uses and their interactions, while only less
than half (47 percent) reported the use of conflict
resolution and mitigation approaches.
*Concerning protection of public
safety, the most common activity was construction of
coastal defense measures such as seawalls, mentioned by
61 percent of respondents.
*Finally, with regard to
proprietorship of public submerged lands and waters, less
than half of the respondents (49 percent) reported the
use of leases and fees for ocean and coastal uses, and 35
percent reported the use of joint ventures for
exploitation of nonrenewable resources.
(top)
|